Smalltalk and Python
Darrell
news at dorb.com
Thu Dec 14 22:53:01 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 14 22:53:01 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Smalltalk and Python
- Next message (by thread): Smalltalk and Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Don't understand why allowing only a single bed within a process would be handy? Wouldn't dropping a bed instance into a scene be good enough? must-be-missing-somethingly y'rs - Darrell "Greg Ewing" wrote: > Just to throw another language into the mix, > the TADS (Text Adventure Development System) > lets you declare objects with multiple > classes, e.g. > > bed: Furniture, Surface, Scenery > ... > > declares a singleton object called 'bed' > which belongs to the classes Furniture, > Surface and Scenery. > > This is really just syntactic sugar, since > you could just as well declare a new class > inheriting from all those and then instantiate > it. But it's extremely handy in a language > designed for applications where the vast > majority of objects tend to be singletons. > > To mention something vaguely Python-relevant: > if Python had a convenient syntax for declaring > singletons, it could be a pretty good language for > Interactive Fiction... >
- Previous message (by thread): Smalltalk and Python
- Next message (by thread): Smalltalk and Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list