Some Python 2.1 ideas
Moshe Zadka
moshez at zadka.site.co.il
Sat Dec 23 23:08:45 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Dec 23 23:08:45 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Some Python 2.1 ideas
- Next message (by thread): Some Python 2.1 ideas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 09:00:25 -0800, "Bob Alexander" <bobalex at home.com> wrote: > New operator: embedded assignment This has already been discussed to death, many times. A PEP would be useful, if only as a way to put a stop to the discussion <wink> > for i in 10: # equivalent to "for i in xrange(10)" > for i in 5:10: # equivalent to "for i in xrange(5, 10)" > for i in 20:10:-1: # equivalent to "for i in xrange(20, 10, -1)" This (actually the similar [i:j:k] notation) has been thought over for 2.0 and rejected. You can read the python-dev archives for the discussion. > Since readline() and its relatives return strings with '\n' attached > (sometimes), it would be convenient to have a built-in string method that > removes one if it exists (seems like I'm often coding little functions to do > this). > > <string>.chomp() # sorry, borrowed the method name from Perl Yep, this actually sounds useful. -- Moshe Zadka <sig at zadka.site.co.il> This is a signature anti-virus. Please stop the spread of signature viruses!
- Previous message (by thread): Some Python 2.1 ideas
- Next message (by thread): Some Python 2.1 ideas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list