why no "do : until"?
Rainer Deyke
root at rainerdeyke.com
Sat Dec 30 12:17:22 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Dec 30 12:17:22 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): why no "do : until"?
- Next message (by thread): why no "do : until"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Steve Lamb" <grey at despair.rpglink.com> wrote in message news:slrn94qt4f.mgg.grey at teleute.rpglink.com... > On Sat, 30 Dec 2000 05:23:26 GMT, Rainer Deyke <root at rainerdeyke.com> wrote: > >At that point it's better to use 'while 1', which is at least idiomatic and > >explicit in its inelegance. > > I'm sorry, but I don't agree. Even though I have no problem with while 1: > initing variables before the loop is more preferable to a break. Esp. when > one can put the condition in the while; unlike reading lines from a file where > one cannot. The example was something like this: T = 0 while T < 25: T = ... to simulate somethjing like this: do: T = ... until t >= 25 In other words, you need to artifically manipulate the 'while' condition to always be true the first time through. If you change the 'while' condition, you may have to change the manipulation. In other words, there's an additional way the code could break. -- Rainer Deyke (root at rainerdeyke.com) Shareware computer games - http://rainerdeyke.com "In ihren Reihen zu stehen heisst unter Feinden zu kaempfen" - Abigor
- Previous message (by thread): why no "do : until"?
- Next message (by thread): why no "do : until"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list