Except an exception AND all its subclasses?
Barry A. Warsaw
bwarsaw at cnri.reston.va.us
Mon Feb 14 18:49:30 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 14 18:49:30 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Except an exception AND all its subclasses?
- Next message (by thread): Except an exception AND all its subclasses?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "MZ" == Moshe Zadka <moshez at math.huji.ac.il> writes: MZ> Where the very beginning is defined as "from the time we MZ> stopped using string exceptions?". I'm sure there was no such MZ> feature when exceptions were strings. In fact, I distinctly MZ> remember a post by the other bot about how to simulate it with MZ> string exceptions. Remember though, that class-based exceptions have been allowed for a very long time, and AFAIK, the catch behavior for classes has been in Python just as long. The primary recent addition was the conversion of the standard exceptions from strings to classes. Using string exceptions, you can still fake the derived class catch by sticking all the string exceptions into a tuple and catching that. MZ> Sorry I didn't resist the temptation to mention time machines MZ> <0.5 wink> No problem. Guido's by far got the neatest one I been in, although it can be dangerous for the novice to operate. Besides that nasty first step, you need to watch out for the blue knob, the bank of yellow buttons below the chronometer, and if the snake shaped klaxon below the chin rest ever starts to play the Monty Python theme song, be very very afraid. -Barry
- Previous message (by thread): Except an exception AND all its subclasses?
- Next message (by thread): Except an exception AND all its subclasses?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list