Traling junk in string.atof (RE: array constructor)
Steve Holden
sholden at bellatlantic.net
Mon Feb 28 01:03:29 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 28 01:03:29 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Traling junk in string.atof (RE: array constructor)
- Next message (by thread): Traling junk in string.atof (RE: array constructor)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kind of "Extraneous crud considered harmful"? regards Steve Ken Seehof wrote: > > I remember reading about a language that generates absolutely no errors of > any kind. Maybe it was called Nobol; I don't remember. The idea is that > a syntax error indicates a failure in the language to provide semantics for a > potentially useful idiom. > > That's not Python. I vote for leaving things like string.atof() the way they > are. > > - Ken > > Tim Peters wrote: > > > [Tom Holroyd] > > > ... > > > While I'm here, string.atof() and float() both barf on "123.45," while the > > > C atof() doesn't. A quick check of the code (stropmodule.c) shows that > > > there is an explicit check for junk at the end of the string. > > > > Right. > > > > > Is there some reason for this besides just being annoying? :-) > > > > Yes, but simply because "123.45," does not match the syntax for "a number". > > The trailing comma may be harmless, or it may indicate your program has > > gotten lost, or that your data has gotten corrupted, or that your data was > > ill-formed to begin with. Python refuses to guess that it makes sense, > > because it has no way to *know*, and guessing "ya, OK" errs in the wrong > > direction (screws *you* the most). Python takes this attitude all over the > > place, btw -- string.atof is just one instance of it. > > > > I'm curious how you ended up with a numeric string with a trailing comma to > > begin with. For example, if you're reading lines of comma-separated values, > > the natural idiom is > > > > numbers = map(float, string.split(line, ",")) > > > > which gets rid of the commas explicitly. > > > > > I vote to remove it. > > > > I'll set up a web page to keep a running tally <wink>. > > > > better-careful-coding-than-endless-debugging-ly y'rs - tim -- "If computing ever stops being fun, I'll stop doing it"
- Previous message (by thread): Traling junk in string.atof (RE: array constructor)
- Next message (by thread): Traling junk in string.atof (RE: array constructor)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list