[Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
Gerrit Holl
gerrit.holl at pobox.com
Thu Feb 3 10:09:00 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 3 10:09:00 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Next message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > """ > > idea: > > para: > > I was editing some text in Python emacs mode the > > other day. > > para: > > I got to thinking how Python mandatory indentation > > emph: > > removes > > much of the need for delimiters I don't like it. For blocks its okay, but for inline thinks it - sucks. In tag language (XML etc.), things get nested much too deep to use this proposal. And blocks are much longer. It should be clear what tag is closed. I don't like it. I think XML suits better. regards, Gerrit. -- Please correct any bad Swahili you encounter in my email message! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- http://www.geekcode.com Version: 3.12 GCS dpu s-:-- a14 C++++>$ UL++ P--- L+++ E--- W++ N o? K? w--- !O !M !V PS+ PE? Y? PGP-- t- 5? X? R- tv- b+(++) DI D+ G++ !e !r !y -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
- Previous message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Next message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list