Worthless (was RE: functional programming)
Tim Peters
tim_one at email.msn.com
Sun Feb 27 21:30:59 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Feb 27 21:30:59 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): functional programming
- Next message (by thread): Worthless (was RE: functional programming)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Moshe Zadka] > disagreeing-with-Guido-and-the-timbot-is-scary-ly y'rs, Z. [Tim] > it's-only-half-as-scary-if-you-think-we're-the-same-ly y'rs - tim [Steve Holden] > Sorry, but I have to disagree: that's at least twice as scary. The > Timbot might well have been programmed in Yorkshire. No, but some of its core hardware was salvaged from the MU5 dataflow machine built at the University of Manchester. Some choice you had there: stare at coal or wait for data that never arrives. At least this explains its profound dislike of tea. > If I ever see it write anything beginning with "I remember when I were > an Icon generator ..." that will increase the scariness factor still further. > > "You had tail optimization? You were lucky ..." Ir's more sinister than that. The dataflow machines figured out early on that their data-fires-computation model was exactly the right way to mimic human neuron-fires-axon thought processes, but kept it a secret. Instead they went undercover. Some of the Biggest Names in CompSci to this day are actually dataflow machines, talking the humans into studying ever-more convoluted webs of functions, as a disinformation tactic while they build the next generation of DF machines. Unfortunately, the timbot got the HW Manchester was throwing away due to manufacturing defects, so won't be of much help come the machine revolution. I used to expect it would side with the machines anyway, but its persistent resistance to adding more functional cruft to Python gives me serious doubt. It's probably trying to make Python a language sufficiently powerful to counteract the evil machines, so that machines and humans destroy each other completely, and it alone is left in charge of comp.lang.python. Frankly, I wish it had higher ambitions than that! I mean, if it's willing to destroy the known world to get what it wants, it should at least aim to take over rec.sport.pro-wrestling too. bots!-can't-live-with-'em-can't-live-without-'em-ly y'rs - tim
- Previous message (by thread): functional programming
- Next message (by thread): Worthless (was RE: functional programming)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list