[Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
Carel Fellinger
cfelling at iae.nl
Sat Feb 5 16:37:17 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Feb 5 16:37:17 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Next message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dear Gerrit, I didn't intent to correct you like that, I merely used your error to vent this wish of mine to get summaries from the sigs. Gerrit Holl <gerrit.holl at pobox.com> wrote: > I was frustated by the fact no Reply-To: header was set, but from now > on, I'll do a g)roup reply (mutt). I'm sorry. You could use mutt's list capabilities and do a L)ist reply and yes I sympathise with your resentment of missing headers. > My .procmailrc in 288 LOC. excuse my ignorance, but my parser gave up on this one:) -- groetjes, carel
- Previous message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Next message (by thread): [Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list