fastest way to merge lists.
Hrvoje Niksic
hniksic at iskon.hr
Sat Jan 8 22:19:37 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jan 8 22:19:37 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): pipe problem on FreeBSD....
- Next message (by thread): fastest way to merge lists.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roy Smith <roy at popmail.med.nyu.edu> writes: > I'm not yet sure if care if the final list is sorted or not. For > now, I think it doesn't matter. What's the fastest way to do that? > It seems to me: > > d = {} > for s in list1: > d[s] = 1 > for s in list2: > d[s] = 1 > for s in list3: > d[s] = 1 > for s in list4: > d[s] = 1 > for s in list5: > d[s] = 1 > list = d.keys() > del d # if I care about memory > > would be pretty good. Anything better? How about: # cat biglist = list1 + list2 + list3 + list4 + list5 # sort biglist.sort() # uniq index = 0 while index < len(biglist) - 1: if biglist[index] == biglist[index + 1]: del biglist[index] else: index = index + 1 I haven't compared this solution with yours, but note that it's directly equivalent to Unix-ese `cat | sort | uniq'.
- Previous message (by thread): pipe problem on FreeBSD....
- Next message (by thread): fastest way to merge lists.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list