Python not a Very High-Level Language?
bjorn
bjorn at roguewave.com
Mon Jan 3 12:24:07 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jan 3 12:24:07 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Next message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aahz Maruch wrote: > In article <386E7BD4.514764EA at ndh.net>, > Stefan Schwarzer <s.schwarzer at ndh.net> wrote: > > > >The other topics which the author on the O'Reilly site, Greg Wilson, > >mentions might also be worth considering. For example, I never needed > >tuples (explicitly) yet, i. e. in a sense that lists would not work. > >(If tuples would be taken out of the language or their use deprecated) > >tuple un/packing would become list un/packing and so on.) > > Anyone who claims that tuples are unnecessary has never used a tuple as > a dict key. That requirement necessitates differentiating between a > mutable and immutable list -- might as well stick with tuples. > -- So what you're saying is that dicts are broken since they can't take lists as keys <wink>. undefined-behavior-isn't-always-bad'ly y'rs -- bjorn
- Previous message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Next message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list