Python not a Very High-Level Language?
Steve Holden
sholden at bellatlantic.net
Fri Jan 7 07:49:58 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jan 7 07:49:58 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Next message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
srenner at lycosmail.com wrote: [...] > As you > are probably only dimly (if at all) aware, I've been using Python and > PyOpenGL to test some realtime rendering ideas. At a certain point I > began to grow increasingly frustrated my lack of control over the many > layers involved (Python, PyOpenGL, Mesa library, X windows, Linux). This is called "sitting on the shoulders of giants". If your alternative is to produce all this stuff yourself, perhaps your situation might seem less frustrating. Could be worse: you might have chosen a Windows platform, or had no choice of platform at all ... > Again, Oz looks so cool. And Python is great. Just not C. Or > anything that reminds me of C. > I'm kind of on your side about C, which has always struck me as a pragmatist's language. And you're probably right about the reason it's so much used (though criticizing Python for being written in it seems unfair: Guido should have chosen assembler, maybe? Surely it's the implementation choices which you disagree with). When I'm teaching class I occasionally take a sideswipe at "the evil empire", and someone replies "but you've got to use Microsoft stuff, everyone does". I wish I could remember where I got the reply I use, which is "In that case you should eat sh*t, since six hundred billion flies can't possibly be wrong". Good luck with your project! regards Steve
- Previous message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Next message (by thread): Python not a Very High-Level Language?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list