Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
Huaiyu Zhu
hzhu at localhost.localdomain
Thu Jul 20 20:33:03 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 20 20:33:03 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:55:33 -0600, Bjorn Pettersen <bjorn at roguewave.com> wrote: > >> OTOH, would you care to give a brief summary of how these other languages >> deal with these issues? It may indeed provide valuable insight. > >I agree with Paul, if you want to use Matlab syntax, use Matlab. Here's >links to APL/J info http://www.acm.org/sigapl/links.htm It would be great if you could summarize some of the issues concerning treatment of multiarray in APL/J. The purpose of this discussion is for all sides to spell out their favorite. Imho, issues that are so involved that could not be explained here are unlikely to be suitable to go into the PEP. As to why not use matlab alone, I think this has been discussed many times already: Other than calculator languages, a languages has far more things than math operators. I'm sure you can compile a long list of advantages of python over matlab. Huaiyu
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list