merging numpy's array into python2
Pete Shinners
pete at visionart.com
Tue Jul 18 14:16:38 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jul 18 14:16:38 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Line numbers outside exceptions
- Next message (by thread): merging numpy's array into python2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
i find using the numerical array stuff to be so useful i was wondering if there are ever plans to implement some of the package into the standard python release? specifically, the array object and it's helpful ufuncs would be great addition to the standard release (imho) i find it hard to imagine having a great/flexible n-D array object (that's fast to boot!) wouldn't be helpful in all pythons uses. python already has a standard "array" module, but it seems pretty weak compared to the numpy version. and the ufuncs work equally well on numpy arrays as well with standard python sequence objects. want to do an element- wise add two lists? i find "List1 + List2" much better all around than "map(lambda x,y: x+y, List1, List2)" (well, i'm sure we're all aware of how numpy works, :] ) is numeric too much baggage for the standard python release? are there areas of development where more rigid and quick arrays wouldn't be beneficial? does the numerical team even wish to be a part of the standard python, or do they prefer their own schedule? to me it seems more useful and a lot less 'specific' than most of the modules that are a part of the std python release. (could it make 2.0?)
- Previous message (by thread): Line numbers outside exceptions
- Next message (by thread): merging numpy's array into python2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list