Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
Aahz Maruch
aahz at netcom.com
Thu Jul 20 09:48:05 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 20 09:48:05 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007191505070.1129-100000 at rocket.knowledgetrack.com>, Huaiyu Zhu <huaiyu_zhu at yahoo.com> wrote: > > matrix element names (with prefix m or e) > + .+ add > - .- sub I am strongly opposed to operators of the form ".+". What happens if take an expression of the form "5.+matrix"? No, that goes against the Python rule of having zero ambiguity. -- --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com) Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/ Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 Q: In a lesbian relationship, who decides who gets to be the man? A: It's two women. There is no man. That's the point.
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list