exceptions (was Re: Perl is worse!)
Martijn Faassen
m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Mon Jul 31 08:11:48 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 31 08:11:48 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): exceptions (was Re: Perl is worse!)
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli <alex at magenta.com> wrote: > "Martijn Faassen" <m.faassen at vet.uu.nl> wrote in message > news:8m3f0o$hn6$1 at newshost.accu.uu.nl... [snip] >> """ >> However I find that bugs come up on the damnedest things, break you >> out of loops, cause problems all around and don't let you return to where > you >> were [in the algorithm], esp. when you use general catch all exceptions. >> As Alex(?) said, you don't return to where you were so, to me, it seems > quite >> impossible to be able to catch /all/ bugs gracefully, ever. >> """ >> >> The answer to that is easy: No, of course not. > Well, ok, not *ALL*. But you can _design_ for that, to avoid corrupting the > precious persistent data, and avoid wasting a lot of worktime by the user, > under presence of MOST kinds of bugs... Yes, but I'd classify that under 'ungraceful handling', as in "well, something went wrong. I'm not really sure what exactly, though perhaps I can guess it's X. Let's at least save state Y and bring the UI back to that state, and go on; it should all be okay". Perhaps your definition of graceful is different. Anyway, you can handle almost all exceptions. I didn't presume Steve was complaining about that; he was complaining it would become a mess. I tried to figure out why he'd think that, and the only reason I could come up with was that he wanted his code to continue in the face of *bugs* (either in the input data or in the program itself). You can catch and handle even bugs in Python, and try to restore your program to a reasonable state. If you use transactions, this can actually be done quite gracefully sometimes. But I'd say the usual case isn't that graceful; in the case of bugs by definition the program doesn't know what went wrong exactly. Regards, Martijn -- History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3? No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
- Previous message (by thread): exceptions (was Re: Perl is worse!)
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list