Python, Perl Rewrites: Alliance?
David Abrahams
abrahams at mediaone.net
Mon Jul 31 05:02:38 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 31 05:02:38 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python, Perl Rewrites: Alliance?
- Next message (by thread): Fixed format input
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
<joneshenry at my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8m38ca$an5$1 at nnrp1.deja.com... > My first question would be whether CNRI also claims in effect > the trademark for the Python language as well as the copyright > for the current source code. Would someone be able to write > a Python compatible language from scratch and still call it Python > without CNRI's permission? As a "standards geek", I should probably point out that there's a bigger obstacle to writing a Python-compatible language, at least if you care about compatibility of existing extension modules: for all intents and purposes, the documentation of the "C" API is in the source code. Yes, there are various documents floating around which purport to document the "C" API, but I've always found that serious work requires reading the source. I suppose it's possible that most extensions only rely on the documented subset of the available API, but I'm guessing that's not the case. -Dave
- Previous message (by thread): Python, Perl Rewrites: Alliance?
- Next message (by thread): Fixed format input
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list