Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
Aahz Maruch
aahz at netcom.com
Sat Jul 22 00:06:03 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jul 22 00:06:03 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <slrn8nevfr.d8.bmcd at ripley.sulaco.net>, Ben Caradoc-Davies <bmcd at es.co.nz> wrote: > >The fact that APL has been mentioned in this thread is a bad, *bad* sign. Yeah, that's my feeling, too. It's not entirely clear to me why we can't use some kind of string-based expression mechanism instead of adding all this at the language level. Python's brilliance is its *clean* syntax. Why are we mucking with the core language for this? -- --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com) Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/ Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 Zie is so far from a clue that it would take a sub-light vessel several years to reach one. --Aahz
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list