Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
Robin Becker
robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk
Mon Jul 24 07:28:11 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 24 07:28:11 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <m3n1j73iuz.fsf at chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr>, Konrad Hinsen <hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr> writes .... >What are "Greg's indexing rules"? Inner and outer product are entirely >different operations in my mind, although in principle the inner >product can be thought of as an outer product followed by a summation. >I think that implementation issues also call for separate operators; >using indexing tricks might be difficult for sparse matrices, for >example. > .... outer products (of vectors at least) are inner products with the second vector being transposed. There is of course a general tensor notation, but as Python lacks the distinction between sub/super scripts that's a bit difficult. One thing I personally find very strange is that very few in this thread seem to want to make the default multiplication operation * into the default matrix multiply. I suppose early language designers have decided this for all time so all choose the unusual element wise operation. -- Robin Becker
- Previous message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Next message (by thread): Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list