Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
Ben Wolfson
rumjuggler at cryptarchy.org
Fri Jul 28 14:56:09 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 28 14:56:09 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 07:59:38 GMT, grey at despair.rpglink.com (Steve Lamb) wrote: >On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 06:52:19 GMT, Ben Wolfson <rumjuggler at cryptarchy.org> >wrote: >>Yes, it does. List returns the list-equivalent of the sequence passed as >>its argument. 1 is not a sequence; it doesn't have a list equivalent. > > 1 is a sequence whether Python likes it or not. I call that a deficiency >in the language. > >>Any _sequence_ can be a single element or sequence. >>Any _single element_ can't be a single element or sequence. > > Let's pause and reflect on a single element not being able to be a single >element. You are, I think, deliberately misinterpreting me. Any single element can't be "a single element or a sequence". It can only be a single element. -- Barnabas T. Rumjuggler NEW Epistemology Strips! Dogs don't know they don't know it's not bacon! -- Ranjit Bhatnagar
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list