CXX and Swig, pros and cons
Phil Austin
phil at geog.ubc.ca
Mon Jul 17 18:26:10 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 17 18:26:10 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): CXX and Swig, pros and cons
- Next message (by thread): CXX and Swig, pros and cons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jérôme Lecomte <jlecomte at ifrance.com> writes: > I am fairly new to Python and I'd like to interface part of a medium > size C++ lib (around 70 classes) to Python. I looked on the www and I > found CXX and Swig. They seem to have fairly different approach of the > problem. I wonder which suits best C++. > I find that CXX has quite a few advantages, e.g: 1) Automatic memory management (no worrying about INCREFs or DECREFs) 2) CXX Dict, List, Tuple String, Array, etc. 3) Integration of Python and C++ exceptions 4) Automatic generation of method tables > If I miss any other tool, please let me know. > You might want to take a look at SCXX: http://www.mcmillan-inc.com/scxx.html Regards, Phil
- Previous message (by thread): CXX and Swig, pros and cons
- Next message (by thread): CXX and Swig, pros and cons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list