Perl is worse!
Jake Speed
speed at ?.com
Fri Jul 28 19:55:33 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 28 19:55:33 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
speed@?.com (Jake Speed) wrote in <so469a2go0b171 at corp.supernews.com>: >morpheus at here.not.there (Steve Lamb) wrote in ><slrn8o449h.49c.grey at teleute.rpglink.com>: > >>On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:38:32 GMT, William Tanksley >><wtanksle at dolphin.openprojects.net> wrote: >>>That's a really cruel statement for you to make. I hope you were >>>making it in jest. I've seen nothing to indicate anything waranting >>>this kind of attack. >> >> Neither cruel or jest. I consider "Automagic" coversion on the same >> vein >>as "Winblows". I have hoped that there were people who were above that, >>there are some, but it is here as in everywhere else. > >The term 'automagic' is commonly used by perl coders and porters. Heck, even pythoners use it to describe python: http://www.cwi.nl/www.python.org/search/hypermail/python-1994q2/0012.html Altavista counts: +perl +automagic* : 3,369 pages +tcl +automagic* : 1,804 pages +python +automagic* : 1,295 pages +awk +automagic* : 1,083 pages +php +automagic* : 505 pages +guile +automagic* : 133 pages +cheese +automagic* : 129 pages +ruby +automagic* : 67 pages +haskell +automagic*: 63 pages -Speed! (apparently, 'pork rinds' are not automagical at all)
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list