Perl is worse!
William Tanksley
wtanksle at dolphin.openprojects.net
Fri Jul 28 18:38:32 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 28 18:38:32 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:15:56 GMT, Steve Lamb wrote: >On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:57:33 +0200, Alex Martelli <alex at magenta.com> wrote: >>a single string, but the % operator has the advantage of being >>easily tailorable > I never did like the whole placeholder for actual values in print >statements or other similar constructs. I fail to see why one must do that >instead of putting what you want there. Of course, you can also do that -- just use concatenation. Instead of "%s%s" % (var1,var2) just use var1 + str(var2) But that's an entirely seperate issue. >>Two days? It must be _at least_ 20 years that people on Usenet are putting >>down other languages (and operating systems, applications, computers, etc) >>for what they consider wrong. Would you have us put them down for what we >>consider _right_?-) > Yeah, yeah, I know this is Usenet. So sue me for once in my life not >wanting to have to come into a new culture and atmosphere without having >everything that I have learned and liked up to this point blasted at every >corner for some ego building, ok? I think I've been at least fair to Python, >all things consider. I really do like the language, I guess I was just hoping >too much from the people. That's a really cruel statement for you to make. I hope you were making it in jest. I've seen nothing to indicate anything waranting this kind of attack. >>That Python has this specific wart does not mean that a language that >>has analogous and worse ones in a thousand places is just the same, >>of course:-). > I'm not saying it is the same. I am just refuting claims that Python >doesn't have then and that they are, senseless, wretched, horrible or any >other negative description people care to place on it. It is different and as >someone (you, mayhap?) said that even typing isn't good in all cases. I know and like languages with far, FAR less typing than Perl (Forth has absolutely none). I don't like Perl. I like Python. I like ML. Perhaps the issue isn't typing at all. > Steve C. Lamb -- -William "Billy" Tanksley
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list