Matlab vs Python (was RE: Discussion: Introducing new operators for matrix computation)
Eric Lorenzo
zo at angband.org
Mon Jul 17 17:27:10 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 17 17:27:10 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Matlab vs Python (was RE: Discussion: Introducing new operators for matrix computation)
- Next message (by thread): Matlab vs Python (was RE: Discussion: Introducing new operators for matrix computation)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Charles Boncelet <boncelet at eecis.udel.edu> writes: > Let's get some facts (yes, I know we are not supposed to let facts > interfere with our arguments on usenet): [Relative popularity measurements deleted.] These metrics are meaningless. You're comparing the popularity of Matlab, the most popular tool for its problem domain (numerical computing), to Python, which (unfortunately) isn't even close to the most popular tool for its problem domain (general-purpose scripting and programming). I'd imagine that establishing that there is a high level of interest in this domain would be a prerequisite for convincing anyone to add the desired features. But your metrics don't tell us anything at all about the relative level of interest in the numerical computing domain, and are thus useless for your apparent purpose. Compare Python+Perl+Tcl+Java+C+C++ to Matlab+(Any other languages targeted towards the numerical computing problem domain. Mathematica?), and you might have something half-worthwhile. Eric
- Previous message (by thread): Matlab vs Python (was RE: Discussion: Introducing new operators for matrix computation)
- Next message (by thread): Matlab vs Python (was RE: Discussion: Introducing new operators for matrix computation)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list