Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
Steve Lamb
grey at despair.rpglink.com
Fri Jul 28 18:13:55 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 28 18:13:55 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:50:27 +0100, Gareth McCaughan <Gareth.McCaughan at pobox.com> wrote: >None doesn't mean "empty object". It means "no object". There's >a big difference, whether or not you care to recognise it. As >big as the difference between "no bottles" and "an empty bottle", >which is insignificant only if all you care about is the beer. :-) i Be hard to fool me on that. type(a) a = None type(a) If it were no object how come it doesn't bomb out again. Maybe the more precise answer would be that I am trying to create the name a and point to nothing. None is not nothing. None /is/s something. It is a type. :P -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Next message (by thread): Perl is worse! (was: Python is Wierd!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list