Convoluted question
Peter Yu
roger_callisto at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 31 21:32:17 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 31 21:32:17 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Convoluted question
- Next message (by thread): How does Python compare to ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <75F7304BB41CD411B06600A0C98414FCB3682D at ORSMSX54>, "Daley, Mark W" <mark.w.daley at intel.com> wrote: > I am a little frustrated by this situation. I have written some code to > take an indeterminate number of server names to create a column of check > buttons: <code and exception snipped> > I think this comes from the fact that I didn't define the names in varlist > as variables. It seems to me that there should be an easy way to assign > variable names for each check button in an automated way, and an easy way to > return the status of a check button. Yup. =) It's not only possible, but quite easy. Given your snippet, try the following: (I'll assume the code's not in a class, though it really ought to be. If it is, replace all instances of checkholder with self and don't worry about declaring blank. =)) servername = ['Server1', 'Server2', 'Server3', ..., 'Servern'] class blank: #Blank class. Or is there a way to reference current env? pass checkbuttons = blank() #Create an empty holder class. for item in range(len(servername)): button_name = 'button%d' % item setattr(checkholder, button_name, IntVar()) b1 = Checkbutton(root, text = servername[item], variable = getattr(checkholder, button_name) b1.grid(row = item, column = 0, sticky = W) Then you can check the values via getattr(checkholder, 'button0') for the very first value, for example. Hope this was helpful. =) Peter Yu Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
- Previous message (by thread): Convoluted question
- Next message (by thread): How does Python compare to ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list