Questions regarding design decisions in listobject.c
Martijn Faassen
m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Wed Jun 7 11:55:07 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jun 7 11:55:07 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Questions regarding design decisions in listobject.c
- Next message (by thread): Questions regarding design decisions in listobject.c
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Courageous <jkraska1 at san.rr.com> wrote: [snip] > Well, yeah, but [0:3] as "element zero through three, inclusive" > is about as intuitive as you can get. While I understand completely > how the current implementation works (reading the source code and > all, dontcha know), I still fail to see *why* this was chosen. a[0:i] + a[i:] == a a[0:len(a)] == a Inserting a list at index i: a[:i] + b + a[i:] In practice, no need to think about a *lot* of off-by-one errors. Regards, Martijn -- History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3? No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
- Previous message (by thread): Questions regarding design decisions in listobject.c
- Next message (by thread): Questions regarding design decisions in listobject.c
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list