Following a file, or cloning tail
Cameron Laird
claird at starbase.neosoft.com
Fri Jun 30 08:16:20 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jun 30 08:16:20 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Following a file, or cloning tail
- Next message (by thread): Following a file, or cloning tail
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <8F62C20E2gmcmhypernetcom at 199.171.54.154>, Gordon McMillan <gmcm at hypernet.com> wrote: . . . >The whole inode thing in that code is because it is a common Linux idiom to >rely on the fact that once a process has opened a file, said file can be >deleted by another process without the reading process noticing. > >This idiom is completely impossible on Windows, so there's no sense in >checking whether a new file with the same name has now been created. > >So what'll it be - a portable version that's useless on Linux, or one that >spends half it's time checking for something that can't occur on Windows ><wink>? > >on-Windows-once-you've-grabbed-the-tail- > you've-got-the-whole-damn-dog-ly y'rs > >- Gordon (who never uses popen on Windows anyway) It's a good question. Is tail(1) in POSIX? I'm out of copies of POSIX documentation again ... It's never been a difficult question for me. I've ended up coding different tail functions (methods) for different pro- jects. Am I committing redundancy in my coding? Barely, and at a level with which I'm comfortable. The general cat- egory here is, "ambiguously defined stuff where the ideas are so clear it's easier recoding them than trying to merge conflicting requirements/definitions." I most often need such a tail for log-scraping, and part of my tail implementations generally is *not* to do what you describe, but to stop reading the mv-ed i-node and pick up with a newly-created file (a log, in my case). This illu- strates the ambiguity in tail's semantics. I repeat: I resolve the ambiguity by my knowledge of requirements spe- cific to a project. You and I might have a slight vocabulary clash. My code often involves tests of os.name. I think of the results as "a portable version", without embarrassment. Perhaps your habit is to regard the same as *not* "pure" Python, and correspondingly "importable". -- Cameron Laird <claird at NeoSoft.com> Business: http://www.Phaseit.net Personal: http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html
- Previous message (by thread): Following a file, or cloning tail
- Next message (by thread): Following a file, or cloning tail
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list