Home Original page

Regular Expressions and Threads?

Aahz Maruch aahz at netcom.com
Thu Jun 15 16:58:50 EDT 2000 
In article <3dd7li696x.fsf at amarok.cnri.reston.va.us>,
Andrew M. Kuchling <akuchlin at mems-exchange.org> wrote:
>aahz at netcom.com (Aahz Maruch) writes:
>>
>> checking for the existence of a match, that could cause problems.  (As
>> with anything else, the re module should be thread-safe, but individual
>> re objects probably are not.)
>
>No, individual re objects should be.  The MatchObject you get back
>from a matching operation contains references to the string, groups,
>and original regex object, but a RegexObject shouldn't ever change
>after it's been created.  Tim Peters put some effort into making the
>cache thread-safe.  Brian, can you post the relevant bits of code so
>we can see what's going on?

Oh, right, for some reason I thought the regex object contained the
match object (Perl-based brainfart).
--
                      --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>     http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

"real love can't be explained by simplistic platitudes."  --piranha
More information about the Python-list mailing list