Pythonwin is terrible!
robin.escalation at ACM.org
robin.escalation at ACM.org
Sun Jun 11 12:02:05 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jun 11 12:02:05 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): was: Pythonwin is terrible! now incremental parsing
- Next message (by thread): Pythonwin is terrible!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Jeff" <no_spam at umich.edu> wrote: >Pythonwin is terrible! On the contrary I find it to be an essential part of development on the Windows platform. Build 129 has an incredible folding editor, multi-pane debugger, and configuration options. Mark Hammond has done us an amazing service. Did you happen to notice that it was free?! >If there are no answers to these questions, someone needs to work on >pythonwin's "development" capabilities. I believe the answer is that we all need to! My abilities are not up to this particular task, but I will soon make available some code I have been working on in another domain. Code that would not yet be ready without PythonWin! This is what open source is all about, no? Yes, we all have improvements we'd like to see. Is any software ever complete or perfect? ----- robin robin at illusionsexeculink.com media artist / remove illusions to reply information architect www.execulink.com/~robin/ The form of e-coli bacteria that causes geomagnetic storms on earth.
- Previous message (by thread): was: Pythonwin is terrible! now incremental parsing
- Next message (by thread): Pythonwin is terrible!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list