Python Productivity over C++
Courageous
jkraska1 at san.rr.com
Thu Jun 15 02:18:14 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jun 15 02:18:14 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python Productivity over C++
- Next message (by thread): Python Productivity over C++
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> As someone who uses and likes both C++ and Python, I think estimates > like that are excessively simplistic. Me, too. And yet I will claim that I've become *more* productive in Python after a brief 4-6 weeks of use than I am in C++ after 15 years of use, and that's no exaggeration. If Python executed as fast as other languages, I'd be tempted to *require* that our staff use it. And please don't take this wrong; I'm no language groupie -- I use C, C++, Java, Python, and Lisp -- all of them both lately and frequently. > I use C++ for commercial programming, because it gives me the power and > control I need. Productivity isn't the best when measured in time to > get the first prototype running, but I've found nothing better when > measured in time to develop, deploy, maintain and support something a > customer will pay for. Shrug. If it weren't for execution speed, your C++ environment would be toast. Admit it. :)- C/
- Previous message (by thread): Python Productivity over C++
- Next message (by thread): Python Productivity over C++
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list