what is easier to learn first?...
Grant Edwards
nobody at nowhere.nohow
Tue Mar 21 00:37:59 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Mar 21 00:37:59 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): what is easier to learn first?...
- Next message (by thread): what is easier to learn first?...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:10:04 -0700, Collin Greene <greene at hctc.com> wrote: >C+/+ or python or perl, I need an unbiased opionion here. An unbiased opionion on Usenet! Good one! >I have NO programming experiance. thanks for your time. >greene at hctc.com I've done a lot of C, a little C++, a little perl and a bit more Python. I'd definitely go with Python. C is for OS kernels, device drivers, and embedded work. It really oughtn't be taught to beginners or people who just want to write an application. C is low-level and unsafe: the programmer's got to do way too much of the housekeeping, and there are countless ways to hang yourself before you've even gotten enough rope out to accomplish anything. -- but at least the semantics are farily simple (assuming you know some assembly language and how compilers work). C++ has all of the disadvanteges of C with none of the advantages. It's complicated but still unsafe. Perl's just too baroque. There are too many hidden things that are hard for a beginner to grok. It's a little better than it used to be, but to me it still looks a lot like line noise. Python is simple, safe, and there are powerful libraries that let you accomplish a lot without tearing your hair out. After learning Python, I would recommend Scheme, Modula-3, or Smalltalk. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is this "BIKINI at BEACH"? visi.com
- Previous message (by thread): what is easier to learn first?...
- Next message (by thread): what is easier to learn first?...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list