Should Python documentation for __class__ be improved?
Tom Funk
_spam_sux_tdfunk at _spam_sux_nettally.com
Thu Mar 16 12:13:39 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Mar 16 12:13:39 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Should Python documentation for __class__ be improved?
- Next message (by thread): Should Python documentation for __class__ be improved?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In an article posted 15 Mar 2000 19:09:27 +0100, Martin von Loewis (loewis at informatik.hu-berlin.de) said: > If you read the types page from the beginning to the end, you should > notice the discussion of "Class", after which " __class__ is the > instance's class" should be clear. You caught me.... <g> I'll go back and start at the top of the page. > However, if it isn't, it is > difficult for the documentation write to know how the wording should > be to make it clearer. So it would be good if you submitted improved > wording yourself <no, I won't use wink> I'll do that, but should I submit it directly to Fred Drake (keeper of the Python documentation) or post it here? -- -=< tom >=- Thomas D. Funk | "Software is the lever Software Engineering Consultant | Archimedes was seeking" Advanced Systems Design, Tallahassee FL. |
- Previous message (by thread): Should Python documentation for __class__ be improved?
- Next message (by thread): Should Python documentation for __class__ be improved?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list