Const-Correctness of Python/C
Andrew M. Kuchling
akuchlin at mems-exchange.org
Thu May 11 11:53:15 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu May 11 11:53:15 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Const-Correctness of Python/C
- Next message (by thread): Newbie questions - FAQ and tuples.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lyle Johnson <jlj at cfdrc.com> writes: > Some older C compilers wouldn't support the const keyword, so that could > be a problem. Note that GNU autoconf already has tests for compilers that don't support const, and the generated config.h file will #define const to the empty string if the compiler doesn't support it. So adding const shouldn't break even old compilers. I don't know if GvR would consider this a priority, but go ahead and post the list of functions that could use the additional const declarations. -- A.M. Kuchling http://starship.python.net/crew/amk/ "Mortal man?" "Yes?" "Beware of the dog." -- Charon warns Orpheus, in SANDMAN: "The Song of Orpheus"
- Previous message (by thread): Const-Correctness of Python/C
- Next message (by thread): Newbie questions - FAQ and tuples.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list