OT [Way OT]: Unicode Unification Objections
Boudewijn Rempt
boud at rempt.xs4all.nl
Mon May 8 16:47:14 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon May 8 16:47:14 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): OT [Way OT]: Unicode Unification Objections
- Next message (by thread): OT [Way OT]: Unicode Unification Objections
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
François Pinard <pinard at iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > The situation is just not similar. I do not have a strong, perpetual need > that the look be different, and the truth is that as a French reader, I > honestly do not mind much if we use the same characters. All the contrary, > it is quite convenient, and not shocking at all. (Not everybody is so > lucky. For example, when Unicode decided that `y-diaresis' could be used > to replace the Finnish `ij' ligature, Finnish people were not very happy.[1]) Us Dutch people ain't that happy, either, quoth Boudewijn. ^^ -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
- Previous message (by thread): OT [Way OT]: Unicode Unification Objections
- Next message (by thread): OT [Way OT]: Unicode Unification Objections
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list