Damnation! (was: Re: Python3k extended grammar)
Russell Wallace
rwallace at esatclear.ie
Sun May 21 19:57:34 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun May 21 19:57:34 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Damnation! (was: Re: Python3k extended grammar)
- Next message (by thread): Damnation! (was: Re: Python3k extended grammar)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote: > This is all taken way out of proportion. I promise that Python 3000 > won't suddenly be introduced without further discussion. Every issue > will discussed here and elsewhere and we'll explain why we want to > change the design. We'll also explain what we're going to do for > compatibility. > > In the mean time, we're too busy with Python 1.6 to be able to answer > each question about Py3k. Once 1.6 is released I promise to create a > FAQ about Py3k. Quick question: Any chance of removing the requirement for colons at the end of class, def, if, for, while lines? That's the only thing about Python's syntax I truly dislike, and I still keep tripping up on it; pretty nearly all the rest I find fine. -- "To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem." Russell Wallace mailto:rwallace at esatclear.ie http://www.esatclear.ie/~rwallace
- Previous message (by thread): Damnation! (was: Re: Python3k extended grammar)
- Next message (by thread): Damnation! (was: Re: Python3k extended grammar)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list