[Python-Dev] Re: No 1.6! (was Re: A REALLY COOL PYTHON FEATURE:)
Barry A. Warsaw
bwarsaw at python.org
Sat May 13 17:40:47 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat May 13 17:40:47 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): No 1.6! (was Re: A REALLY COOL PYTHON FEATURE:)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] join() et al.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "CT" == Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.com> writes: CT> If it came to the point where the string module had some extra CT> methods which operate on two lists of string perhaps, we would CT> have been totally lost, and enforcing some OO method to CT> support it would be completely off the road. The new .join() method reads a bit better if you first name the glue string: space = ' ' name = space.join(['Barry', 'Aloisius', 'Warsaw']) But yes, it does look odd when used like ' '.join(['Christian', 'Aloisius', 'Tismer']) I still think it's nice not to have to import string "just" to get the join functionality, but remember of course that string.join() isn't going away, so you can still use this if you like it better. Alternatively, there has been talk about moving join() into the built-ins, but I'm not sure if the semantics of tha have been nailed down. -Barry
- Previous message (by thread): No 1.6! (was Re: A REALLY COOL PYTHON FEATURE:)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] join() et al.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list