password security
Anders M Eriksson
anders.eriksson at morateknikutveckling.se
Fri May 19 08:43:15 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri May 19 08:43:15 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): password security
- Next message (by thread): [Q] Examples for Excel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 19 May 2000 04:10:33 -0400, "Tim Peters" <tim_one at email.msn.com> wrote: >> Is this secure on any level? > >MD5 is still widely thought to be secure, although Nagging Doubts Have Been >Raised. The biggest risk with any password scheme is that people tend to >pick easily-guessed passwords, and IMO that swamps the risk due to MD5. sha Thanks for the answer I think I understand. The random string will not add to the security, because it's easy to retrieve the data from the python byte-code. And the md5.digest() will not be any more secure for a long password than for a short one. the only difference is that with a brute force attach the short one will probably occur earlier. Since this application isn't aimed at an audience of cypherpunks or similar I will just use the simple: md5.new(user+pw) // Anders
- Previous message (by thread): password security
- Next message (by thread): [Q] Examples for Excel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list