CPython vs. Jython/JPython
Courageous
jkraska1 at san.rr.com
Mon Nov 6 00:24:57 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Nov 6 00:24:57 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Next message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> I think this poster was referring to the fact that most JVMs are >> written in C, necessarily creating a bit of a chicken and the egg >> problem. Which isn't to rule out all sorts of other possibilities, >> of course. :) > >Maybe I came in late and missed something, but the statement I quoted >doesn't seem to be talking about which came first. Um. I really don't know the posters original intent, but most arguments of this sort allude to general tendency of Java users to execute their java byte codes on a JVM. This JVM is usually written in C. Ergo it is "impossible" to have faster Java than C, because it's really C which is doing the execution. This is forgetting native compilers, and the like, course. This is also forgetting various advantages one might not use given standard normal practices in one language and not the other. It really depends on where you're coming from, I'm sure. C//
- Previous message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Next message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list