CPython vs. Jython/JPython
Bill de hÓra
bill at dehora.fsnet.co.uk
Wed Nov 1 16:50:04 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Nov 1 16:50:04 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Next message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Ingo Adler" <ingo.adler at synacon.ch> wrote in message news:39FF4663.A7B5E81E at synacon.ch... : Bill de hÓra wrote: : : > ANSI C is very possibly more portable than Java. : : Really? Really. >What are the #ifdefs for in "ANSI C" - Python? They're for portability :-) : > Raw C written by a good programmer is typically more efficient in space ... : : There are benchmarks that show the opposite. : Evidence please. : > Java is owned by a company, you have to pay Sun Microsystems a tribute to : > sell Java code. : : Is this really true? Yep. : I think, Guido made the point in this thread: JPython is used as glue for : Java-Apps and CPython is used as glue in C++-Apps. It's not possible to replace : one with the other (easily) for this purpose . I think Guido is underselling Python and its libraries. Just use Python, it doesn't need any glue. -Bill de hÓra
- Previous message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Next message (by thread): CPython vs. Jython/JPython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list