P*rl in Latin, whither Python?
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 11 06:49:08 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Nov 11 06:49:08 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): P*rl in Latin, whither Python?
- Next message (by thread): P*rl in Latin, whither Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Suchandra Thapa" <ssthapa at harper.uchicago.edu> wrote in message news:slrn90o5ek.3lu.ssthapa at localhost.localdomain... [snip] > perligata follow latin's substitution of i, and v for j and u respectively, > not allowing k since roman's didn't have j, u, w, or k in their alphabet? Also Actually, the emperor Claudius (a scholar, before events propelled him to the purple) introduced the letter 'u' (he claimed that using 'v' for it, an old convention, had no connection any more with current pronunciation of the two sounds; spelling/pronunciation correspondence was quite important to Latin scholars), though it took a while to be fully accepted. > whether verbs are properly conjugated or nouns declined (verbs have ~60-70 > forms, the one used depends on the subject, the tense, whether the verb is Read the paper -- it simplifies this (and various irregularities) a lot, while keeping the basic idea that words' inflections, not word order, are the key of the syntax. (Existing programming languages can be taken as similarly-drastic simplifications of word-order-based syntax). Alex
- Previous message (by thread): P*rl in Latin, whither Python?
- Next message (by thread): P*rl in Latin, whither Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list