PEP 4: Deprecation of standard modules
Michal Wallace
sabren at manifestation.com
Mon Oct 9 12:04:38 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 9 12:04:38 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Can I use the XML-utilities with Python 1.6? - trying to upgrade XML Processing with Python-code
- Next message (by thread): PEP 4: Deprecation of standard modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9 Oct 2000, Martin von Loewis wrote: > Well, that is the whole point of the PEP. Without asking, I wouldn't > know which modules are still in use and which are not. I will > undeprecate the gopher module in the next revision of the PEP, > documenting who is using the module still. Then, ten years from now, > we can ask this person whether he is still using gopherlib, then in 50 > years, and so on. Once he doesn't use it anymore, we can again > deprecate it and wait for somebody else to claim using it :-) Why deprecate modules at all? Why not just move them out of the standard distribution and make a home (page) for outcast modules.. As long as you can get to this stuff from parnassus, everyone should be happy. Or am I missing something? Cheers, - Michal ------------------------------------------------------------------------ www.manifestation.com www.sabren.com www.linkwatcher.com www.zike.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): Can I use the XML-utilities with Python 1.6? - trying to upgrade XML Processing with Python-code
- Next message (by thread): PEP 4: Deprecation of standard modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list