[Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich comparison
Charles Boncelet
boncelet at udel.edu
Tue Oct 24 11:27:54 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 24 11:27:54 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli wrote: > "Charles Boncelet" <boncelet at udel.edu> wrote in message > news:39F4A4DE.9202540A at udel.edu... > [snip] > > > > > Guido thinks that 2/3 returning 0 was a design mistake, > [snip] > > I often want 2/3 to equal 0, but then again I learned FORTRAN years ago. > > > > My point is that if 2/3 = 0.667, then special syntax is needed for those > > applications that want 2/3=0. The current syntax is very simple, even > > if slightly confusing to a complete newby. > > Note that a prominent beginners' language, Pascal, avoids this > specific design mistake: 2/3 is 0.6666667, and you use 2 div 3 > if you want truncating-division. 2/3 returns a floating-point > number also in another language that may well be the only one > a beginner knows, Visual Basic in all of its forms. Therefore, > it is quite possible that people who have programmed before get > very surprised by the truncation -- not everybody is learning > Fortran, C or Java as their first language...:-). I certainly concede 2/3=0 may be startling to a newcomer, but feel that its as important or more so for a language to appeal to experienced programmers. E.g., Fortran, C, Java are survivors and lots of serious code are written in these languages. Pascal is a dying (dead?) language. Visual Basic is a survivor, but not because 2/3 = 0.667 :-) > > > I'd rather have 2/3 return a _rational_ number 2/3, as in > Scheme -- another reasonably popular beginners' language. > But that requires having rationals built-in, I guess...:-). Having never learned Scheme, I didn't know this. A built-in rational class is an interesting notion. Charlie -- Charles Boncelet 302-831-8008 Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering 302-831-4316 (fax) University of Delaware boncelet at eecis.udel.edu http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~boncelet/
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list