Initial value of sys.path
Paul Moore
paul.moore at uk.origin-it.com
Mon Oct 30 06:07:04 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 30 06:07:04 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Initial value of sys.path
- Next message (by thread): Initial value of sys.path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:47:24 +0100, Mark Hammond <MarkH at ActiveState.com> wrote: >Paul Moore wrote: > >> The initial value for sys.path on WIndows is signiicantly different >> from that on Unix. Specifically, there is no site-packages directory >> on Windows. >> >> This is clearly a deliberate decision (as far as I can see, it's >> enshrined in site.py, where it depends on os.sep being '/', and in >> distutils/command/install.py, where it is in the INSTALL_SCHEMES >> dictionary. > >I believe the deliberate decision was simply to "leave windows alone". >It wasn't clear at the time how useful the site packages would truly >turn out to be, and Windows already had special registry support. > >I don't think anyone will argue against extending this support into >Windows, as long as it played well with the existing Windows specific >mechanisms. But as has been stated in recent threads, this is OSS, so >your guess is as good as mine as to _when_ it will get fixed - probably >when someone with enough motivation cares enough. Currently, that rules >me out ;-) One day it may worry my employer, tho! Hm. It seems to me to be a relatively simple change (just wait for me to be proved wrong :-), and I care, so I'd be willing to look at fixing this. The question then arises, where do I submit patches to? Paul.
- Previous message (by thread): Initial value of sys.path
- Next message (by thread): Initial value of sys.path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list