C's syntax (was Re: Python Formatted C Converter (PfCC))
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 24 05:52:21 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 24 05:52:21 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): C's syntax (was Re: Python Formatted C Converter (PfCC))
- Next message (by thread): C's syntax (was Re: Python Formatted C Converter (PfCC))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Ben Wolfson" <wolfson at midway.uchicago.edu> wrote in message news:Bi7J5.414$v3.4961 at uchinews... [snip] > >C is not a trivial language, so the rules are not trivial. If you have > >sloppy thinking or are not familiar with the details of the language, > >you will get yourself into trouble with a non-trivial language. But > >then that's true of a trivial language as well. > > A non-trivial language needn't have tortured syntax. Bingo. Very good word-choice. C manages to be effective DESPITE its "tortured" syntax, *because* syntax, fortunately, is _not_ as important as all that (and people get used to almost-anything if they have to use it long enough -- they even grow to _like_ it, as a peculiar but well-known psychological phenomenon, which I've already compared, half-jokingly, to the Stockholm Syndrome). But hearing this tortured syntax called "pretty good" grates on me like nails scraping a blackboard...!-) Alex
- Previous message (by thread): C's syntax (was Re: Python Formatted C Converter (PfCC))
- Next message (by thread): C's syntax (was Re: Python Formatted C Converter (PfCC))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list