Code obfuscation / decompilers? (fwd)
Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters
mertz at gnosis.cx
Mon Oct 9 12:23:31 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 9 12:23:31 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Code obfuscation / decompilers? (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): Code obfuscation / decompilers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Joshua Muskovitz" <josh at open.com> wrote: |This has been covered in previous posts. The algorithm, like it or not, is |pre-existing. I have no choice but to use it. Help me solve my problem, |don't criticize the constraints I work under. I know Josh is under constraints and all that. He inherited the bad code. And I suppose "real world" programming is different from theory. All that said, I know I certainly would not approach this problem by trying to find some code obfuscation technique (I have been in pretty much exactly the same situation). I would tell my employer straightforwardly that the current algorithm was broken, and it is a waste of time to try to cover up the problems with obscure code. The security is worthless with bad algorithms. If they want to ship a worthless algorithm, fine. There is not need to obfuscate it, just live with worthlessness. Otherwise, fix it. The moral to my mind is: Some problems are not WORTH solving. Yours, Lulu...
- Previous message (by thread): Code obfuscation / decompilers? (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): Code obfuscation / decompilers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list