François Pinard pinard at iro.umontreal.ca
Sun Oct 1 11:47:10 EDT 2000

• Previous message (by thread): very good reasons?
• Next message (by thread): very good reasons?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

> [Grant Griffin]

> >I would have expected sort and reverse to return the list in question,
> >but instead they return None.  So I had to do something like:

[Kragen Sitaker]

> If you want Perl, you know where to find it: in Python!  Here's how:

> def sort(x):
> 	y = list(x)
> 	y.sort()
> 	return y

> def reverse(x):
> 	y = list(x)
> 	y.reverse()
> 	return y

I'm not sure that `y = list(x)' returns `y' different than `x', if `x' is
already a list, in which case the functions above would mutate operands,
which is not welcome.  Maybe (?) it would be safer to write:

def sort(x):
	y = x[:]
	y.sort()
	return y

def reverse(x):
	y = x[:]
	y.reverse()
	return y

-- 
François Pinard   http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard

---

• Previous message (by thread): very good reasons?
• Next message (by thread): very good reasons?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list