[Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
Fredrik Lundh
effbot at telia.com
Thu Oct 26 11:03:32 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Oct 26 11:03:32 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pete wrote: > What has not been mentioned is that the "2" and "3" are integers. If > you want them to be floats they should be spelt "2." and "3." in the > same way that longs would be spelt "2L" and "3L". why? </F>
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list