PythonWin IDE sucks!
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 27 18:44:55 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Oct 27 18:44:55 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): PythonWin IDE sucks!
- Next message (by thread): PythonWin IDE sucks!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak at knm.org.pl> wrote in message news:slrn8vjnr8.kqo.qrczak at qrnik.knm.org.pl... > Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:07:49 +0200, Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> pisze: > > > as it runs the code under development in the same process as the IDE, > > if said code does something sufficiently disruptive (and bugs will > > cause that, sometimes...), then the IDE itself hangs or crashes. > > (I consider this "proof" that an IDE must run the code being > > developed under _another_, separate process > > Unless it is implemented in a safe language. If a "safe language" is one that, among other things, cannot access through foreign-function interfaces any other in-process component, I guess. Most language implementations these days do offer a FFI, as their actual usefulness for anything but toy/teaching stuff would be negligible if they didn't (cfr unsigned Java applets...:-). If you _can_ load a .so/.DLL/ActiveX control/in-process COMponent/ etc, etc, then it doesn't matter much what language you're loading it from -- your process *can* hang or crash, period. Alex
- Previous message (by thread): PythonWin IDE sucks!
- Next message (by thread): PythonWin IDE sucks!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list