Python equivalent of CPAN (Was: ANY NEWS ON THE STARSHIP?)
roger day
roger at nenuphar.freeserve.co.uk
Sun Oct 29 11:00:37 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 29 11:00:37 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python equivalent of CPAN (Was: ANY NEWS ON THE STARSHIP?)
- Next message (by thread): Python equivalent of CPAN (Was: ANY NEWS ON THE STARSHIP?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I quite like the idea of CPAN for Python, but I find the perl CPAN difficult at times to find the precise elements I needed to do something. Worse, the modularisation of Perl had, for me, the unintended side-effect of splitting out much needed modules. For example, the "old" lwp.pl package now consists of a myriad of different modules which need hunting down if I just wanted to do something simple, particularly on Unix. The ActiveState perl does a lot of this already - batteries included. It's not modularisation I dislike, I think it's the way of distributing the modules which needs looking at - and not just for ease of installation. I think there should be some way of grouping modules, so that, say, if one module needed others to work, then the latter should be loaded and installed at the same time. Or something like that :-) "Roland Mas" <mas at echo.fr> wrote in message news:873dhmfb74.fsf at cachemir.echo-net.net... > Miles R. Fidelman (2000-10-24 13:34:12 +0000) : > > > it's even easier than that, if you have the cpan module installed: > > perl -MCPAN -e shell Roger.
- Previous message (by thread): Python equivalent of CPAN (Was: ANY NEWS ON THE STARSHIP?)
- Next message (by thread): Python equivalent of CPAN (Was: ANY NEWS ON THE STARSHIP?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list