[Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
"Jürgen A. Erhard"
juergen.erhard at gmx.net
Mon Oct 30 23:58:56 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 30 23:58:56 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Donald" == Donald O'Donnell <donod at home.com> writes: [...] Donald> The rule is very simple and easy to remember: If an Donald> expression consists of all integers, the result is an Donald> integer; if it contains mixed integers and floats, the Donald> integers are promoted to floats, the calculations are done Donald> using floats, and the result is a float. This rule is very simple... and easy to remember... and *wrong*. What would be the result of (2 / 3) * 3 according to this rule? Well, 2.0 of course. But in reality it's 0, as we all know. For the record, I'm all for 2/3 giving 2/3 (a floating point approximation thereof, or better yet, a rational) Bye, J -- Jürgen A. Erhard juergen.erhard at gmx.net phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326 My WebHome: http://members.tripod.com/Juergen_Erhard George Herrimann's Krazy Kat (http://www.krazy.com) "No matter how cynical I get, I can't keep up." -- Bruce Schneier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 248 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20001031/f3afc9f0/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list